How unfair is this?

Ottawa - 14 September 2010

Here is a situation that just came to my attention.  It’s an indicator of all the things that are wrong with the “system” and shows how the “system” just steam rolls over those in the way and ignores those that are trying to make a difference.

An aging Veteran in his mid 90’s applies for a Disability Award.  Almost six months later a favourable decision is made, but the Veteran dies two weeks before the decision is rendered.  In the meantime, while the family is dealing with the Veteran’s death, they receive the Disability Award cheque in the mail.  Shortly after, the executor of the estate receives a letter that the monies have to be returned to Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) because the Veteran has to be alive when the decision is made in order to receive a Disability Award.   This office is contacted by the executor of the estate to see if it could help resolve the problem.  The Office asks to meet with VAC and is told that VAC is seeking some additional guidance and would get back to it.  In the meantime, the “system” approaches the bank directly, follows normal collection practices, and demands its money back. The bank returns the money in question from the beneficiary’s personal account.  VAC finally informs our Office that they have solved the issue and, therefore, there was no longer a requirement to talk.

If VAC communicated and reached out to Veterans better, Veterans would apply for benefits before they are in their mid-90s.  If VAC didn’t have such ridiculously long turnaround times (24 weeks for a first application that is straight forward) the above-described Veteran would have received his benefit before he died!  If VAC provided better case management, they would have tried to expedite the process for someone who is in their mid 90’s.  And, despite VAC’s mandate to collect the “overpayment”, if VAC had any empathy for the family they should have sought a compassionate resolution to this issue.  VAC should have worked with the Office of the Veterans Ombudsman if it was struggling to find a solution.  All it did was use the long arm of government to rip away what truly belonged to the Veteran and his family.

Why is there no recognition that the Veteran, in his 90’s, did his part of the application process the right way? Why are he and his family penalized because he dies before VAC’s cumbersome adjudication process is completed? In this case, the result of VAC’s inability to process applications and issue cheques in a timely fashion is that he and his family are denied what was his and his family’s in the first place.  Yet VAC doesn’t have any timing problems collecting so-called “overpayments”.  It’s incredible how efficient and effective VAC is in that regard in comparison to its inefficient track record on processing applications and delivering benefits. 

This aging Veteran should have had the comfort of knowing that he would be able to leave a small amount of money to his family when he died.  He earned it through his service to country.  Why did they take it back?  What is their legal basis for creating an overpayment in the first place?  The opinion of this Office is that there is no legal requirement for the Veteran to be alive on the date of decision.

You wonder why I am frustrated and speaking out?  This is just one more instance of the often irrational bullheadedness with which I have to deal with on a daily basis.  And, this is why I continue to fight for Veterans and their families and why you need to become involved.  The “system” has to change and with your help, it can be changed!

P@ (Pat)

Date Modified: 2013-02-07

Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter      Subscribe with RSS (Really Simple Syndication) RSS Feed
Add to del.icio.us Add to del.icio.us      Add to Digg Add to Digg
Add to Facebook Add to Facebook       Add to Reddit Add to Reddit
Add to StumbleUpon Add to StumbleUpon

Blog Comments

Please add your comment below. Remember if your submission is a complaint about your circumstances please use the Submit a Complaint section.

Important Notice – By participating, you are taking personal responsibility for your comments, your username and any information provided. To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, comments containing personal information will not be published. "Personal information" means information about an identifiable individual that is recorded in any form. It may include, but is not limited to: name, address, email address, race, ethnic origin, medical and employment history, and identifying numbers. Note as well that the views or opinions expressed about another individual are considered personal information about and belonging to that individual.

Note: All fields marked with a red asterisk (*) must be filled out.

* Your Full Name: (will not be published)



* "I have read and I agree to the Conditions of Use."

Privacy Notice – Provision of the information requested on this form is voluntary. It is collected under the authority of the Veterans Ombudsman Order in Council P.C. 2007-530. The information is collected for the purpose of providing an opportunity for the public to provide input on issues identified in the Veterans Ombudsman’s blog. Personal information that you provide is protected under the provisions of the Privacy Act. The Act provides you with the right to access and request correction of your personal information. Your personal information will be stored in Personal Information Bank number VAC PPU 210. If you have any questions, contact our Access to Information and Privacy Coordinator.

Comments

mad44 said:

September 25, 2010 2:04 AM

A VETERAN. said:

September 21, 2010 10:12 AM

Jim in Ontario said:

September 18, 2010 1:54 PM

D.D said:

September 18, 2010 12:40 AM

William said:

September 16, 2010 11:32 PM

D. D. said:

September 16, 2010 12:50 AM

William said:

September 15, 2010 9:22 PM

Sheri said:

September 15, 2010 2:56 PM

Pro Patria said:

September 15, 2010 2:31 PM

Katherine Wilson said:

September 15, 2010 1:38 PM

W Callaghan said:

September 14, 2010 9:02 PM

Ron said:

September 14, 2010 8:14 PM

Stymer said:

September 14, 2010 5:31 PM

Old Silverback said:

September 14, 2010 12:24 PM